Administration Defends Policies toward Lobbyists

 

On Oct. 19 the chairs for the Industry Trade Advisory Committees (ITAC) sent President Obama a letter expressing opposition to the announcement that registered lobbyists should be prohibited from serving on federal advisory boards. The group asked Obama to reconsider the guidance. Norm Eisen, counsel to the president on ethics and government reform, posted another blog with both the group's letter and the administration's letter in response. "While we recognize the contributions some of those who will be affected have made to these committees, it is an indisputable fact that in recent years, lobbyists for major special interests have wielded extraordinary power in Washington DC, resulting in a national agenda too often skewed in favor of the interests that can afford their services."

The response letter further stated; "The President's overarching goal is to reduce special interest influences that threaten the public interest and undermine public confidence. And his concerns extend to the appointment or retention of those who lobby the government and simultaneously serve on federal boards and commissions."

These consistent remarks are confusing because the administration's initiatives are not seemingly reducing the influence of special interests, and in fact deterring transparency.

Meanwhile, Eisen continues to defend the administration's policies towards registered lobbyists. The Hill reports on Eisen's talk to the American Bar Association's (ABA) fall conference.

One particular sore point is how the administration had singled out lobbyists, as opposed to corporate executives or counsels, by using registrations under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) to limit access. Eisen said the White House felt it would be too difficult to set up a new regulatory regime and that it was best to build off the one already in place under the LDA, though he acknowledged relying on lobbying registrations had its limitations.

The Legal Times blog also covered the conference and noted one panelist Nick Allard, of Patton Boggs, who said; "Right now it’s popular to make a show of turning lobbyists away from the front door while sending them around the back."

(Amanda Adams* 10/23/09)

Comments

Graphing campaign election donations

The disguise of election donations is easily debunked by graphing donations in any given nonprofit by those years when large influxes of cash become suddenly available to an organization. Demands for that type of tracking (or more finely tuned tracking) is necessary due to the fact that organizations retain 95% of their donations - tax free - while only 5% is required to be spent upon their stated purpose. Using nonprofits and charities or religious organizations as conduits for campaign cash is particularly devastating to American democracy because of the problem of hoarding that has been allowed to them, tax free hoarding at that. It is the equivalent of siphoning funds out of the economy and shifting them into the control of shadow government called nonprofits, charities, and religion.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.