Final Defense Bill Includes Franken Anti-Rape Amendment

 

Back in October, I wrote about Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) and his praise-worthy amendment to the FY 2010 Defense appropriations bill that would bar the government from contracting with companies who prevent their employees from bringing workplace sexual assault cases to court. The amendment passed easily 68 to 30 – with the thirty senators who voted against the measure receiving a good amount of backlash – but shortly after the vote there were rumors that conferees would strip the amendment from the final bill during reconciliation with the House. Not to fear, though, because according to Sam Stein over at the Huffington Post, the Franken amendment survived, and the final language is "remarkably strong."

Sen. Al Franken (D-MN)

An aide to Franken told Stein "the substance of the language 'is unchanged,'" which means the government will not be able to contract with companies that restrict employees from going to court over charges of "assault, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress or negligent hiring practice[s]." Moreover, the Title VII provision of the amendment, which allows an employee to sue not only the alleged perpetrator but also the perpetrator's employer, remains in the bill as well. The amendment applies to all contracts totaling $1million or more.

There is a small loophole in the amendment, but it will be hard for contractors to get through it:

The Franken amendment includes a national security waiver, meaning that the Department of Defense could prevent a case from coming to court if it imperils safety measures. But, for that to happen, the Secretary of Defense would have to "personally explain why the waiver was used to Congress and at that point make it public," the Franken aide explained.

This solid amendment will prevent contractors from carrying out what were some of the most despicable business practices I think a company could foist on a person.

Image by Flickr user Aaron Landry used under a Creative Commons license.

(Gary Therkildsen 12/16/09)

Comments

This is a silly admendment.

This is a silly admendment. There are already laws that protect against discrimmination. And an employer is not responsible for an employee raping someone, or robbing someone, or even yelling at someone.

An employer is, however,

An employer is, however, responsible for allowing employees who are raped on the job to report the assault to the police and, if a contractor, to the federal government.

That's what Franken's amendment is about, not holding employers responsible for rapes or robberies. It was necessary because government contractors were intimidating assaulted employees and preventing them from reporting these crimes.

If the contractors hadn't been bad actors in the first place, this amendment wouldn't have been necessary.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is intended to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.