Schools Hesitant to Spend State Aid Money

 

In Wednesday's New York Times, there was an interesting coda to one of our recent Watcher articles: despite receiving large amounts of money from the recently passed state aid bill, school districts are not acting quickly to rehire fired teachers. The worry is next fiscal year might see even larger budget gaps, necessitating another, larger, round of firings. So the school districts would rather save the money, to try to stave off what could be an even worse FY 2011, and in the process, are potentially hamstringing any positive effects of the state aid bill.

Interestingly, this is the same problem facing the nation at a larger level. The future is as uncertain as ever, with many worried about their job security. The American people, as a whole, are guarding against that uncertainty by spending less and saving more. If you're worried you're not going to have a job in six months, you're definitely not going to be going out and buying that new car, or going out to the movies as often. This trend is borne out by looking at the nation's personal savings rate, measured as a share of disposable income, which is currently at its highest level since the early 1990s. In essence, then, the school districts aren't doing anything different than the rest of the nation. Everyone's saving to prepare to a bleak tomorrow.

This lower level of spending, or lower aggregate demand, is what is keep the nation's economy depressed. That's why we need significant federal investment in the economy, through stimulus bills like the Recovery Act, to make up for the lower consumer spending. And that's why we need a second stimulus. Clearly, half-hearted spending bills like the state aid bill are not enough to kick start this economy.

(Sam Rosen-Amy 08/19/10)

Comments

I don't think it's solely

I don't think it's solely government's responsibility to address economic problems. In fact, I would argue that the largest share of the responsibility should rest on the shoulders of for-profit corporations.

Private corporations got us into the current economic mess, and it's up to them to get us out of it again. They're only going to be able to do that, however, if they start creating jobs, and they can't wait until demand and consumer confidence increase. Why? Because consumer confidence and demand will never increase as long as tens of millions of Americans are out of work. If we're going to get the economy moving again, these entities must do their part and put people back to work.

There are three immediate ways that Corporate America could start the process of creating jobs for Americans:

  1. Immediately stop outsourcing jobs to other countries and bring back as many jobs as possible from China, India, Southeast Asia, and Mexico. American companies should be employing Americans to make their goods and provide their services.
  2. Take half of the nearly $2 trillion in wealth that for-profit corporations are sitting on and launch a large-scale, private job creation initiative.
  3. Stop any and all for-profit corporate spending on politics and elections, including all independent expenditures, all contributions to political action committees, and all donations to front groups. For-profit corporate spending on politics is pure waste; that money should instead be directed toward creating jobs.

So, Corporate America, do you accept the challenge?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.