The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which includes seven members with strong industry connections, recently released its recommendations for an update of Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Not surprisingly, the committee's recommendations for controlling intake of carbohydrates, sugars and fats were vague and weak, prompting 25 nutritionists to send a letter to HHS calling for stronger, clearer language.The 13-member committee, appointed by USDA and HHS in August 2003 has strong ties to food, drug, dietary supplement and other related industries. According to a Center for Science in the Public Interest article, the members of the advisory committee include:
In response to the committee recommendations, 25 nutrition experts sent a letter to HHS calling for stronger, clearer language. While praising the underlying science used by the advisory board, the letter criticized the weakness of the committee's conclusions. "The scientific fine print in the advisory committee's report makes it clear that Americans should be eating much less saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, and added sugars," the Center for Science in the Public Interest's Margo G. Wootan said in a press release
As reported in an earlier Watcher article, the dietary guidelines have also been the subject of a Data Quality challenge filed by the industry-funded think tank Center for Regulatory Effectiveness.
In an attempt to free health guidelines from the influence of industry, Sen. Peter Fitzgerald (R-IL) offered a bill last year that would assign the responsibility of writing dietary guidelines to the Institute of Medicine. "Putting the USDA in charge of dietary advice is in some respects is like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse," Fitzgerald told CongressDaily.
However, many charge that Congress itself is too easily bullied by the powerful food industry. When Fitzgerald held a hearing last year on the issue, he was forced to hold the meeting in "the Commerce Committee instead of the Agriculture Committee subcommittee, which he also chairs, because the Agriculture Department and food companies had pressured Agriculture Committee not to hold the hearing," according to the Congress Daily.
With Fitzgerald set to retire next year, the issue will likely get swept under the rug.