Guns-in-Parks Rule on Hold Indefinitely

 

The Obama administration will accept a federal judge’s ruling that blocked implementation of a rule allowing loaded firearms to be carried in national parks. While the National Park Service (NPS) goes back to the drawing board, the 26-year-old ban on guns in parks will go back into effect.

Allowing guns in parks was one of many deregulatory actions the Bush administration took during its final months in office. Like many of the so-called midnight regulations, the Interior Department, which houses NPS, took shortcuts to speed up the usually lengthy rulemaking process. Knowing its time in office was about to run out, Bush officials chose not to assess the effects lifting the ban might have on park wildlife.

Park advocates objected, saying the rule would have put animals in national parks at greater risk. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies evaluate the effects of new rules on the environment, but NPS performed no such assessment.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly sided with park advocates. According to The Washington Post, “[S]he wrote that officials ‘abdicated their Congressionally-mandated obligation’ to evaluate environmental impacts and ‘ignored (without sufficient explanation) substantial information in the administrative record concerning environmental impacts’ of the rule.”

Obama’s Interior Department has not completely given up on the Bush rule; but it will oblige in conducting an environmental review, according to AP. That process, which sometimes takes years, will put this rule change on hold for now.

(Matthew Madia 04/20/09)

Comments

I agree--- people with CCW

I agree--- people with CCW licenses are hardly a threat to wildlife. They have taken the time to get their license, they are not going to shoot an animal. Regardless of the legislation, people who want to bring a loaded gun in a national park, will bring a loaded gun in a national park.

"would have put animals in

"would have put animals in national parks at greater risk". The folks that actually have a CCW license probably have more respect for the wildlife then the folks that would / will bring in a weapon illegally in the first place. This goes back to the criminals are still going to get the weapons no matter what legislation is emplaced on those folks who legally obtain weapons.

"chose not to assess the

"chose not to assess the effects lifting the ban might have on park wildlife"? That's a stretch, a joke, and a slap in the face to both our Bill of Rights and all the future Meredith Emersons who get kidnapped/raped/murdered/decapitated because the anti-rights types keep them disarmed.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is intended to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.