|
You have reached a web page on our old web site. To visit our new web site click here. |
Back to Estate Tax Resource Page
|
Coalition to Preserve the Estate Tax Letter Opposing Repeal of the Estate Tax To sign on this letter, e-mail Cate Paskoff at paskoffc@ombwatch.org
| ||||||||
|
March 21, 2001 Dear Representative: We urge Congress not to repeal the estate tax. The estate tax is an integral part of our overall tax system. It is an important source of federal and state revenue. It is an incentive for charitable giving. As our most progressive tax, it inhibits the growth of large concentrations of wealth. Repeal of the estate tax will cut federal revenue by an estimated $294 billion over the next ten years. Once fully repealed the loss of revenue would be more than $60 billion a year, far in excess of most discretionary programs serving low-income and vulnerable individuals. Further, repeal of the estate tax will cut resources to states, most of which have estate taxes that are piggybacked on the federal tax. The cost to states alone could be as much as $9 billion a year after full repeal. Since property or money left to a charitable organization is entirely exempt from the estate tax, it acts as a powerful incentive for charitable giving. Repeal is likely to dramatically decrease charitable contributions. According to the Treasury Department, repeal will reduce charitable bequests by $5 to $6 billion a year. Other estimates range from a decline of 12% to almost 80%. This would have a large impact not only on charitable bequests to individual charities but also to private foundations, which in turn provide grants to charities. The estate tax is a tax on the wealthiest Americans-less than 2% of all estates pay any estate tax, and in 1997 over one-half of the total tax collected came from the largest five percent of taxable estates. At a time when only a little less than 40% of total wealth in the United States is held by the top one percent of households, the issue of wealth concentration within the same family over generations is a cause for concern. One purpose of the estate tax when it was made permanent in 1916 was to discourage great concentrations of wealth and the creation of an aristocracy. Contrary to the assertions made against it, the estate tax is not, for the most part, a double tax. One-half to three-fourths of most taxable estates consists of unrealized capital gains that have never been taxed. Proponents of repeal also argue that family farms and small businesses are being hurt by the tax. Yet very few pay the tax and such payments make up a tiny percentage of estate tax revenue. Nonetheless, if there are problems with the estate tax, the solution is to make appropriate modification to the law, not repeal it. Supported by,
ACORN For more information, visit www.ombwatch.org/npadv/estatetax/ | ||||||||
| ||||||||